Joint Commission: The complete guide to accreditation for quality and safety of care and the differences with HAS.

In the healthcare sector, trust is a cornerstone. Patients, their families and funding bodies need to be assured that facilities are providing care that is not only effective, but also safe and people-centered. This is where The Joint Commission, the largest and most influential accreditation body in the United States, comes in. Founded in 1951, this independent organization's mission is to objectively assess healthcare organizations in order to measure, evaluate and improve their performance. Becoming accredited by the Joint Commission is more than just an administrative formality; it is a profound commitment to excellence, a strategic approach to anchoring patient safety and quality of care at the heart of daily practice. Accreditation is embodied by the prestigious Gold Seal of Approval®, a recognized symbol of quality and safety that attests to a facility's compliance with rigorous standards and regular auditing by a trusted third party. This article explores in depth what the Joint Commission is, the accreditation process, the standards on which it is based, and the practical implications for healthcare facilities and their patients.

What is Joint Commission accreditation? A commitment to excellence

Joint Commission accreditation is defined as a formal, objective evaluation process carried out by an independent body. Its main purpose is to determine whether a healthcare organization meets specific, demanding standards of quality and safety in care. In practical terms, when a facility achieves accreditation, it means that it has undergone a thorough evaluation of its practices and demonstrated its ability to deliver safe, effective and patient-centered care.

This approach is much more than simple certification. It is designed as a powerful lever for establishing a culture of continuous improvement within facilities. By undergoing this process, organizations are encouraged to analyze their own operations, identify weak points and implement corrective actions to reduce the risk of errors and improve care coordination. In this way, accreditation becomes an internal management tool, helping to strengthen the safety culture and open up departments for better overall patient care.

Recognition by the Joint Commission is a major vote of confidence for all stakeholders:

• For patients and their families, it means that the facility is committed to using best practices to ensure their safety and the quality of the care they receive.
• For funders and supervisory authorities, it confirms that the organization meets high performance criteria, which are often a prerequisite for access to public funding.
• For healthcare staff, it enhances the value of their work and engages them in a positive process of improving their professional practices.

In short, accreditation by the Joint Commission is not an end in itself, but an ongoing journey towards excellence, marked by a public commitment to offering the safest, most reliable care possible.

The Joint Commission standards: the reference framework for high-quality care

At the heart of the accreditation process are the Joint Commission's standards. These standards are not abstract rules, but a robust operational framework designed to guide healthcare facilities towards excellence. They are developed with input from experts in the healthcare field, and are constantly updated to reflect current legislation, the latest scientific data and feedback from professionals in the field. The aim is to ensure that standards are informed by evidence associated with structures and processes that predict better care.

These standards are resolutely patient-centered and cover the entire care pathway, from organizational systems to the clinical processes essential to delivering safe, high-quality care. They are not limited to medical or nursing procedures, but encompass the entire organization of the facility. Key areas covered by the standards include :

• Patient rights and information: ensuring that patients are respected, informed and involved in their care choices.
• Infection prevention and control: implement rigorous protocols to minimize the risk of nosocomial infections.
• Managing and securing medicines: ensuring that medicines are stored, prescribed, dispensed and administered safely and effectively.
• Safety of high-risk procedures and prevention of medical errors: identify high-risk procedures and implement safety barriers to prevent errors.
• Therapeutic patient education: providing patients with the information and skills they need to actively participate in their treatment.

In addition to its own standards, the Joint Commission also incorporates fundamental regulatory requirements. These include the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS ) Conditions of Participation (CoPs ), which are requirements that healthcare organizations must meet in order to participate in federally-funded healthcare programs. The standards also include recommendations from theOccupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), aimed at protecting the safety and health of employees from biological, chemical and other work-related hazards. This comprehensive framework ensures that accredited facilities comply not only with best clinical practices, but also with the most stringent legal and regulatory obligations.

The accreditation process: an in-depth, multi-stage examination

The path to achieving and maintaining Joint Commission accreditation is a rigorous, cyclical process, designed to ensure objective assessment and continuous improvement. It is broken down into several key stages, from initial preparation to renewal.

1. Preparation and self-assessmentEverythingbegins with an internal preparation phase. The healthcare facility familiarizes itself with the specific standards applicable to its sector of activity. It then carries out a complete review of its current practices, comparing them with the Joint Commission's requirements. This self-assessment enables gaps and areas requiring improvement to be identified. The facility then implements corrective action plans to comply with the standards. This initial step is often the catalyst that engages teams in a dynamic of continuous improvement, well before the experts' visit.

2. Submitting the applicationOnceready, the organization officially submits its application to the Joint Commission. The application specifies the detailed profile of the facility (size, services offered, number of beds, specialties, etc.) and formalizes its willingness to enter the accreditation process.

3. The Site Survey: The Crucial StageThisis the pivotal moment in the process. A team of external experts, generally made up of clinicians and healthcare managers trained by the Joint Commission, visits the facility for an on-site assessment. A fundamental element of this visit is that it is unannounced. During their visit, which lasts several days, the surveyors :

• Observe care practices directly with patients.
• Consult patient files to check traceability and compliance of care.
• Inspect premises and equipment for safety and suitability.
• The aim of this immersion is to verify that standards are truly integrated into the organization's culture and practices, and not just in written procedures.

4. Accreditation assessment and decisionAfterthe on-site survey, the results are meticulously analyzed by the Joint Commission. If the facility demonstrates satisfactory compliance with the standards, accreditation is granted for a period of three years (or two years for laboratories). If deviations are identified, the establishment must implement corrective measures within a specified timeframe. The final accreditation decision will only be issued once these corrective measures have been validated.

5. Maintenance, Follow-up and RenewalAccreditationis not a definitive achievement. During the three-year cycle, the establishment must maintain its level of compliance. Unannounced follow-up visits or inspections triggered by a complaint may take place at any time. In the event of serious breaches of safety or quality, accreditation may be suspended or even withdrawn. At the end of the cycle, the facility must go through the whole process again to renew its accredited status, thus ensuring a lasting commitment to excellence.

Who's involved? The wide range of accredited organizations

The Joint Commission is recognized as the only accreditation body in the United States whose scope covers the entire continuum of care. Its flexibility and the specificity of its standards enable it to assess a wide variety of healthcare facilities, each with standards manuals adapted to its mission and environment. This approach ensures that the assessment is relevant and fair, whether the facility is a large teaching hospital or a small rural clinic.

Among the main types of health and human services organizations accredited by The Joint Commission are :

• Hospitals: This includes general hospitals, university hospitals and psychiatric hospitals.
• Critical Access Hospitals: Smaller facilities, often located in rural areas, that play a vital role for their communities.
• Ambulatory Health Care structures: Ambulatory surgery centers, group practices, dialysis centers and other facilities where patients do not stay overnight.
• Nursing Care Centers: Long-term care facilities and nursing homes.
• Soins à Domicile (Home Care): Agencies providing medical, nursing or rehabilitative care in patients' homes.
• Laboratory Services: Clinical and pathology laboratories, whether independent or part of a hospital.
• Behavioral Health Care & Human Services: Structures specializing in mental health, addiction treatment and social services.
• Assisted Living Communities: Residences for the elderly requiring assistance with activities of daily living.
• Rural Health Clinics.
• Telehealth services: Remote healthcare services provided via information technology.

This exhaustive list demonstrates the Joint Commission's ability to apply its quality and safety principles to virtually every link in the healthcare chain. Each accreditation program has specific resources, guides and tools to help organizations at every stage of their journey towards excellence.

Federal Deemed Status: An essential link with federal programs

One of the most important and influential aspects of Joint Commission accreditation is its recognition by the U.S. federal government, a status known as "Deemed Status". To understand this concept, you need to know that in order to participate in federal health insurance programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, and receive corresponding payments, a healthcare facility must prove that it meets strict health and safety requirements. These requirements, known as Conditions of Participation (CoPs) or Conditions for Coverage (CfCs), are defined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Normally, certification of compliance is obtained following a survey conducted by a state agency on behalf of the federal government. However, CMS has set up a process called "deeming" (recognition by equivalence). Through this process, CMS formally recognizes that certain national accreditation bodies, such as The Joint Commission, have standards that meet or exceed Medicare requirements, and a survey process comparable to that of the government.

When a healthcare organization obtains accreditation from the Joint Commission under a program recognized as "deemed", it is automatically considered to meet Medicare and Medicaid requirements. This "Deemed Status" is therefore crucial for many facilities, as it simplifies the certification process and directly conditions their economic viability by giving them access to federal funding. In addition, the costs incurred for the Joint Commission's investigation can be included in the facilities' annual cost reports, which is a significant financial advantage.

The programs for which the Joint Commission holds this "Deemed Status" are numerous and include, among others:

• Hospitals and psychiatric hospitals.
• Critical access hospitals.
• Ambulatory surgery centers.
• Home care agencies and hospices.
• Clinical laboratories.
• Rural health clinics.

To ensure the consistency and reliability of this system, the CMS carries out random validation surveys and complaint investigations in Joint Commission accredited organizations with "Deemed Status". The Joint Commission works closely with the CMS, providing accreditation reports and reporting any adverse decisions, thus ensuring ongoing transparency and oversight.

State recognition and impact on licenses

Beyond its crucial role at federal level with Deemed Status, Joint Commission accreditation is also widely recognized and used by government agencies at state level. In the American healthcare system, each state has its own regulations and requirements for licensing healthcare facilities. Accreditation plays a central role in this quality monitoring process.

Recognition" by a state means that the regulatory agency accepts, requires or refers to the Joint Commission's accreditation in the exercise of its authority. This recognition can take several forms:

• Substitution for state inspection: This is the most common form. Many states accept the Joint Commission's accreditation survey in place of their own routine inspection for the issuance or renewal of a license. This avoids duplication of audits and reduces the administrative burden for public establishments and agencies.
• License condition: In some cases, state regulations may require accreditation by an organization such as the Joint Commission as a sine qua non condition for obtaining or maintaining an operating license.
• Participation in the state's Medicaid program: Accreditation is often a requirement for a facility to participate in its state's Medicaid program and be reimbursed for care provided to beneficiaries.

Today, the Joint Commission's accreditation and certification programs are recognized by at least one agency in every state across multiple provider types. The organization actively monitors state legislative and regulatory activities to identify new opportunities for recognition, and maintains a public database of state regulations that reference its programs. This deep integration into state and federal regulatory frameworks underscores The Joint Commission's status as a key player in the regulation of healthcare quality in the United States.

The concrete benefits of accreditation and the associated challenges

Embarking on an accreditation process with the Joint Commission represents a significant human and organizational investment for a healthcare facility. It requires the mobilization of teams at all levels, the rigorous formalization and documentation of processes, and the acceptance of a potentially demanding external perspective. However, the resulting benefits are long-lasting, affecting every facet of the organization.

The major benefits of accreditation include :

• Improved Quality and Safety of Care: This is the most fundamental benefit. By complying with standards, facilities reduce the risk of medical errors, improve care coordination and enhance overall patient safety.
• Building Public Confidence: The Gold Seal of Approval® is a powerful symbol that communicates to patients, their families and the community a commitment to excellence. Knowing that a facility is regularly audited by an independent and respected organization increases confidence.
• Management Lever and Culture of Continuous Improvement: The process encourages the implementation of structured continuous improvement initiatives. It fosters a safety culture in which the reporting of errors is encouraged, not to punish, but to learn and progress collectively.
• Regulatory Recognition and Financial Benefits: As mentioned above, accreditation facilitates compliance with federal (CMS) and state requirements, often conditioning access to essential public funding.
• Image enhancement and attractiveness: Joint Commission accreditation is a competitive advantage. It enhances a facility's image with partners and insurers, and can help attract and retain talented healthcare professionals.
• Shared success: The Joint Commission highlights the experiences of accredited organizations, enabling others to learn from their successes and the strategies put in place to achieve their quality and safety objectives.

Challenges to overcome:The main challenge lies in theinvestment of time and resources. Preparing for a survey requires significant mobilization of staff, updating of documentation, and potentially material investment to correct non-conformities. The unannounced nature of the visit can also be a source of stress for teams, even if it is designed to reflect the reality on the ground. Maintaining compliance over the three-year cycle requires constant vigilance and committed leadership to ensure that continuous improvement is not just a one-off project, but a genuine corporate culture.

Joint Commission vs HAS: what are the differences?

1. Origin and status

• Joint Commission (US): a private, non-profit organization founded in 1951. Its accreditation is voluntary, but it is recognized by the federal authorities (CMS) and has become a de facto must for many establishments.
  
• HAS (France): independent public authority created in 2004. Certification is mandatory for all public and private healthcare establishments.
  
  

2. Purpose

• Joint Commission: improving the quality and safety of care, meeting the requirements of funding bodies (Medicare/Medicaid), strengthening patient confidence.
  
• HAS: guarantee a uniform level of quality and safety across the country, respond to national public health policy, promote transparency for users.
  
  

3. Standards and benchmarks

• Joint Commission: standards developed with experts and based on US regulations, scientific data and international best practices. Strong focus on patient safety (medication management, infection control, patient rights, etc.).
  
• HAS: certification standards focused on the patient-partner and professional practices. Integrates risk management, relevance of care, patient experience ("patient tracer" criteria).
  
  

4. Evaluation procedure

• Joint Commission :
  
  
  • Surprise visits.
    
  • Team of surveyors (doctors, nurses, managers).
    
  • Direct observation of care, patient/professional interviews, file audits.
    
  • Accreditation period: 3 years (2 years for labs).
    
    
• HAS :
  
  
  • Planned visit but with a "window" period (to limit artificial preparation).
    
  • Team of expert-visitors trained and mandated by the HAS.
    
  • Methods: patient tracer, system audit, targeted audit.
    
  • Duration: 4 years, with intermediate monitoring via indicators (IPAQSS, e-Satis, etc.).
    
    

5. Recognition and impact

• Joint Commission :
  
  
  • Accreditation recognized by CMS → conditions Medicare/Medicaid funding.
    
  • Gold Seal of Approval® in public communications.
    
  • Highly influential internationally (some hospitals in Europe, the Middle East and Asia require this accreditation to attract patients and investors).
    
    
• HAS :
  
  
  • Certification essential for working in France.
    
  • The results are publicly available (Scope Santé website).
    
  • Integrated into the 6ᵉ certification cycle (2021-2025), with mandatory themes (e.g. relevance of care, medication risk management, city-hospital coordination).
    
    

6. Common ground

• Patient safety approach.
  
• Importance of on-site visits, with actual observation and interviews.
  
• Continuous improvement rather than spot checks.
  
• Strong involvement of care teams and governance.
  
  

7. Key differences

• Voluntary vs. mandatory: in the USA, accreditation is voluntary but essential for financial survival; in France, HAS certification is mandatory.
  
• Weight of funding: in the US, accreditation is a condition of access to Medicare/Medicaid funding; in France, certification is not directly linked to funding, but it does have an impact on reputation and regional contractualization policy.
  
• Assessment culture: the Joint Commission places strong emphasis on compliance with standards, while the HAS focuses on thepatient experience and safety culture (notably via the patient tracer).
  
  

In a nutshell:

• The Joint Commission is a highly recognized label, focused on credibility and international recognition, with strong financial and strategic value.
  
• The HAS is a compulsory national body, more closely integrated into French public health policy and focused on regulating and harmonizing practices.

‍

Conclusion: The Joint Commission, a strategic partner for the future of healthcare

Ultimately, the Joint Commission is much more than just an evaluator. It is a strategic partner for healthcare organizations committed to excellence. Its approach, based on rigorous standards, objective peer evaluation and constant monitoring, provides a solid framework for anchoring quality and safety at the heart of the healthcare mission.

Accreditation is a demanding process, but its benefits are far-reaching: improved patient safety, greater confidence on the part of the public and the authorities, and a virtuous internal dynamic that drives teams to excel. In an ever-changing healthcare system, choosing Joint Commission accreditation means investing in resilience, performance and, above all, in protecting what is most precious: the health and well-being of patients. It's a clear commitment to providing the safest, most reliable care, validated by the Gold Seal of Approval®.

Source :

https://www.jointcommission.org/en-us/accreditation/what-is-accreditation

‍

‍